Skip to content

Settings and activity

1 result found

  1. 2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Future Opportunity  ·  Josh responded

    Great suggestion. We’ve struggled with this as the workout may be created based on a zone methodology different from an athlete’s or multiple athletes’ zones. Thus Zone 2 per the workout may not map correctly to different users depending on each users’ specific zone settings. We will continue to look into this as we agree planning and execution of workouts is often based on zones – we’re just wanting to ensure if we do enable this, it’s usable for athletes with differing zone settings/methodologies. Thanks for your feedback!

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Travis Brown commented  · 

    Totally agreed on this font.
    1) Since each athlete will get the same physiological response to training in Zone 1 for example, when building a training plan this would be the ideal way to structure it. As it currently works, you may prescribe 80% HR Max, which for one athlete could be zone 1, and another zone 2.
    2) Being able to suggest a zone to target for a workout, rather than a specific HR number would also be much more useful, as many athletes get confused when only a specific HR is given
    3) It could even be structured the same way that the RPE is currently added, where no specific HR is given, as each athlete will know their specific HR zones.
    4) Rechecking each and every workout to make sure the right ranges have been set for every athlete gets super annoying!
    Thanks for the consideration!