The stronger pacers typically use more lumpy routes, which makes some sense - however while the pace on the climbs is good, it's then followed by a long period of super easy spinning down the descents. If you keep the power on, you drop the pacer and have to try and regroup.
It would be really good to have a pacer which hits those same numbers on the climbs, but maintains the power on the descents or has shorter/shallower descents between ramps, giving a more consistent workout.
Peter Hitt supported this idea ·
The stronger pacers typically use more lumpy routes, which makes some sense - however while the pace on the climbs is good, it's then followed by a long period of super easy spinning down the descents. If you keep the power on, you drop the pacer and have to try and regroup.
It would be really good to have a pacer which hits those same numbers on the climbs, but maintains the power on the descents or has shorter/shallower descents between ramps, giving a more consistent workout.