Settings and activity
5 results found
-
7 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment 
Tom Hampton
supported this idea
·
-
102 votes
Efficiency Factor and other decoupling metrics are currently available for reporting in WKO4. You can download a 14 day trial of WKO4 for Mac here, the PC version will be available by the end of the year.
http://home.trainingpeaks.com/products/wko4Tom Hampton
supported this idea
·
-
3 votes
The app uses a few new features of the Connect IQ 2.2 SDK, which allows content to be downloaded, stored, and executed on the device. Unfortunately, the 920XT and Fenix 3 are both CIQ 1.x devices, so our app will not run on those devices.
Currently the supported devices are:
Edge 1000, 820, & 520
FR935
FR735XT – pending a firmware update
Fenix 5 – all variants
Fenix Chronos – pending a firmware updateIf you have a Fenix 3 or 920XT you can still get workouts from TrainingPeaks on to your device. I agree that it is a lot of steps, but you could do this in batch once or twice a week to save some time.
https://help.trainingpeaks.com/hc/en-us/articles/115001076908-Structured-Workout-Export-for-Garmin-DevicesTom Hampton
shared this idea
·
-
1 vote
You should be able to enter this information directly into the “Workout Details Editor” section in the lower right once you’ve created the basic structure by dragging/clicking the blocks on your workout. Please let me know if for some reason this isn’t working for you. Thanks!
An error occurred while saving the comment Tom Hampton
commented
Oops! I meant to post a link to the help page, too:
http://help.trainingpeaks.com/hc/en-us/articles/235164967-Workout-Builder
An error occurred while saving the comment Tom Hampton
commented
You can do exactly that. From the workout builder help page:
7.The details of each block can also be viewed and manually edited below the preview pane in the "Workout Details Editor" section. In this section, the name of each block as well as notes for each interval or block can also be added (cadence targets, for example).
-
9 votes
Great question. We’ve continued to ponder this. We use a different Y-axis scale to display TSS, ATL and CTL so that a user is better able to discern the (relatively) small changes in CTL which are key to tracking training performance. If the TSS scale was the same as ATL and CTL, the larger changes and thus scale of TSS would likely make it difficult to easily monitor changes in CTL.
An error occurred while saving the comment Tom Hampton
commented
While I agree with the concern in the arbitrary sense....Per the workout design recommendations from Mr. Friel (in this article: http://www.joefrielsblog.com/2015/06/part-2-training-stress-scoreso-what.html), workouts should be scaled based on current CTL, as follows:
Hard workout—add 50 to 100% to CTL
Moderate workout—add 10-30% to CTL
Easy workout—subtract 20-30% from CTL
Within these specific confines plotting workout TSS on the same scale as CTL/ATL should be workable because you are limiting the scale differential to 2x between TSS and CTL. With that approach, Hard workouts will be MAX scale, and CTL will be mid-scale. Any workouts which are above max scale (2x CTL) could be color coded to indicate that the real value is well off scale.
This approach would allow us to visually see which workouts are increasing fitness (>>CTL) and which are maintaining (or not) current fitness (<= CTL). it also gives visual clues as to which workouts may be too intense for current fitness (>>2x CTL)....color coded, and visually obvious as being OFF-SCALE.
Tom Hampton
supported this idea
·
I agree completely. For me all of the temperatures appear to be about 10F higher than actual. I'm not sure if OpenWeather is using Heat Index or what....but, its wildly wrong, and completely USELESS in the US.