Settings and activity
14 results found
-
37 votes
Andrew Walker supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment -
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Many of us have taken a long time getting used to incorporating our trainer lags to current physics. Any changes should be considerate to not having a long learning process, and also should not disadvantage lighter riders (using a pure watts 'barrier' to force through or suchlike).
-
11 votes
-
14 votes
-
5 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment The crucial thing is to be able to stop being bumped off a wheel/out of draft by a rider coming from behind which is probably the biggest problem with the current physics model. It is super annoying to be constantly happening in a TTT when it is accidental but almost unavoidable due to lags from trainers/internet.
-
10 votes
-
98 votes
-
91 votes
-
14 votes
Many thanks for your suggestion, and support for TrainingPeaks Virtual.
To confirm, the TrainingPeaks Virtual physics engine already takes into account the height and weight of riders, so - to use your example - you will already experience a higher drafting effect when sitting behind a larger rider.
All that is currently missing is the graphical representation of that.
-
17 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Simply as stated in the title. A good method of implementation would be a 'Running Events' tab to be added to Popular/Competitive etc. This would allow drop in viewing of team-mates, important races, different time-slots for races you are in, partners to check when you are about to finish. Possibly would be good for coaches to drop in at the harder end of a workout so as to not have to 'waste' valuable time.
-
27 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Another idea. Allow an organiser of an event to either identify/not identify bots and humans. I think it would quickly become self evident what was preferred and organisers would adapt whilst there would be a niche and ability for the minority preference(which I feel would be non identification).
An error occurred while saving the comment I'd add that generally in a race we will ask in the chat 'who is real here' and the humans will generally respond. So tbh either humans or bots might as well be marked as such since not everyone has an available keyboard to respond and say 'hi I'm human'. Most folks like to know, although it may not seem that way on the discord as there are a very loud minority of folk shout anyone down who mentions bot identification.
-
3 votes
-
7 votes
-
97 votes
This would also allow the creation of 'handicap' or 'hare and hound' races.