Skip to content

Settings and activity

11 results found

  1. 8 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Andrew Walker supported this idea  · 
  2. 43 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Andrew Walker supported this idea  · 
  3. 63 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Andrew Walker supported this idea  · 
  4. 12 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Many thanks for your suggestion, and support for TrainingPeaks Virtual.

    To confirm, the TrainingPeaks Virtual physics engine already takes into account the height and weight of riders, so - to use your example - you will already experience a higher drafting effect when sitting behind a larger rider.

    All that is currently missing is the graphical representation of that.

    Andrew Walker supported this idea  · 
  5. 10 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Andrew Walker shared this idea  · 
  6. 26 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Andrew Walker supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Andrew Walker commented  · 

    This would also allow the creation of 'handicap' or 'hare and hound' races.

  7. 22 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Andrew Walker commented  · 

    Another idea. Allow an organiser of an event to either identify/not identify bots and humans. I think it would quickly become self evident what was preferred and organisers would adapt whilst there would be a niche and ability for the minority preference(which I feel would be non identification).

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Andrew Walker commented  · 

    I'd add that generally in a race we will ask in the chat 'who is real here' and the humans will generally respond. So tbh either humans or bots might as well be marked as such since not everyone has an available keyboard to respond and say 'hi I'm human'. Most folks like to know, although it may not seem that way on the discord as there are a very loud minority of folk shout anyone down who mentions bot identification.

    Andrew Walker supported this idea  · 
  8. 3 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Andrew Walker supported this idea  · 
    Andrew Walker shared this idea  · 
  9. 7 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Andrew Walker supported this idea  · 
  10. 6 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Andrew Walker shared this idea  · 
  11. 52 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Andrew Walker supported this idea  ·