249 results found
-
Merging Garmin
I currently have a Garmin watch (currently Forerunner 955) and a Garmin Index scale. Everyday my health data from Garmin is synched from Garmin Connect to TrainingPeaks. However, they synch separately and I end with two different entries. One with the weight metrics from the Garmin scale, and another with the sleep data and other metrics from the forerunner. I believe all health data should be incorporated into a single daily file, at least for the first weigh in of the day. I understand some people might want to weigh themselves more than once daily, and that could make it…
9 votes -
set dates per athlete in analistics
about dates, I noticed that when I adjust a chart you do it for all athletes, whichis sometimes pretty annoying as some riders have a lot more data than others so I always have to set the date. It would be nice if you can set dates individually per athlete
1 vote -
Cumulative Training Volume
There should be a report on available on the Dashboard that shows stats like cumulative training time, distance, and elevation gain. I'm shocked that I have to go to a Strava account to get these features... Cumulative elevation isn't even available in CSV file exports.
Consider opening the Data Exports to have selectable fields for export (that include all of the fields that are currently captured for any individual workout or available to report on in the dashboard).
4 votes -
Make Realistic Swimming Pace By Zones
I’d like to request that the “Pace by Zones” section for a swim be updated. Currently Zone 2 is a sub 48.12 100m, which is 1.32 seconds off world record pace. I don’t know that anyone is currently physically capable of hitting Zone 3.
I’m guessing there’s some sort of typo and maybe they were meant to be 1:44 and 1:39 pace, but was just hoping it could be corrected so the metric is in any way useful.
3 votes -
Calculate NGP using hrTSS
I would like the option to calculate NGP using hrTSS. Using rTSS to derive NGP is inadequate for trails or variable terrain.
I'm a trail/ultra runner and am new to TP, though not new to tracking/analyzing data. I recently discovered that you can't assess NGP on a run unless you use rTSS. Using a pace-based threshold for trail running is entirely inadequate. My threshold pace would vary considerably depending on a huge variety of factors; steepness, terrain under foot, condition of the trail, heat/humidity/weather, etc. For example, if my threshold pace on a flat paved road is x'xx/mi, but I…
1 vote -
Being able to create own custom laps or recalculate laps
I would like to be able to create laps within TP. At the moment can only use auto laps from garmin. I would like to crop workouts within TP then recalculate 1km laps again after editing. Please allow this
4 votes -
provide additional metrics
I'd like to ask the inclusion of Lung Volume (l) and Pulmonary Power (W) into the Metrics function of TP. This is relevant to track the concurrent lung training which is recommended for many aerobic exercises. Moreover popular training equipment like PowerBreathe provides this data already.
3 votes -
peak Heart Rate chart
It would be useful to include 3 minutes (anaerobic TH) on the peak Heart rate chart and 20km,25km and 35km on the Peak Pace Chart.(Marathon training)
6 votes -
******* levels
Custom Field Creation: Enable users to create custom fields in their activity logs. These fields would be specifically designed to record ******* levels at different heart rates. This customization allows for more precise tracking of an athlete's physiological responses to training.
Data Input Options: Athletes or coaches can manually input ******* levels, measured through blood ******* testing during or after workouts, alongside the corresponding heart rate at the time of the test.
Graphical Data Representation: Integrate these custom fields into the platform's existing data visualization tools. For instance, a graph could plot heart rate (BPM) against ******* levels over time,…
3 votes -
AWC/W'
Add AWC/W' graphic.
I think that it's an important thing to add in metrics and in the graph to better analized races and trainings6 votes -
Optional pace / HR alert options
Allow users the option to receive pace and HR alerts during structured workouts instead of automatically imposing them on us. They can be helpful but they can also interfere with how we have our watch set up. It seems like they happen when you're trying to read a different data field. Add a selectable option in the workout summary/builder screens to toggle them on/off as desired.
5 votes -
Analytics top 20 based on w/kg
It would be nice to have the top 20 of records not only in absulte watt but also in w/kg. So it’s easy to see how your w/kg records are.
1 vote -
Add longer durations for peaks
Please add longer standard durations for Peaks. Currently the max duration for measuring power or HR is 90 minutes. However, many fitness events, for example Gravel cycling or running marathons, last much longer than 90 minutes. Being able to measure performance over longer durations than 90 minutes is a key requirement, in training for events such as these.
There are other Ideas for the ability to define custom durations. That would be very good, but would also take quite a bit of developer time to implement since it’s a more complex function. As a short term, easier-to-implement enhancement, please just…19 votesAgreed! Longer duration peaks would be rad - we're keen on these too.
-
Fatigue, Fitness and Form
It would be great if you could go back in time and look at your fatigue, fitness and form from past races.
6 votes -
max hr in data export
Add max heart rate per activity to data export.
1 vote -
larger window of "laps and splits"
Is there any possibility to make the window of "laps and splits" bigger? Not everyone has a large monitor. It's not easy to check all laps there. I always have to check on Garmin Connect (if i have the connection).
Would be great !!Thanks
1 vote -
Run cadence inaccurate in laps view
When I view run cadence in the laps view, it is completely wrong and not matching the actual recorded data.
E.g., when doing sprints (high cadence of ~190) it shows low cadence of just over 100. The. When walking (low cadence) it shows high cadence.
Not sure what is going on here.
During the run and in the Apple app it displays the correct cadence, it’s like the training peaks app just reads it completely wrong for some reason.
I use an Apple Ultra 2 watch.1 vote -
Planned work and kcal
Can you PLEASE have it so that workouts include planned work (kj) and planned calories (kcal) provided in the plans?
1 vote -
Fix swim distances so the are accurate on "Analyze" screen
My swim workouts no longer show the actual continuous distances I have swum during a workout under the “Laps & Splits” display but rather show my entire workout in many 25 yard increments.
TP says this is because of how the data is received from Apple in the “fit” file. But Apple says they have not made any changes and/or that you (TP) should contact Apple through the developer channels to discuss with them.
Regardless of where the issue lies, something changed (for me) around 10/3 and continues to happen now. Before that date, I could "analyze" my swim workouts…
-
10:31 swim view of TP user display showing 25 yard increments received in fit file instead of actual distances swum (what Derek sees in TP).png 144 KB -
10:31 swim view of actual distances swum in Apple Fitness.png 252 KB -
9:24 swim view of TP user display showing correct distances swum (what Derek sees in TP).png 132 KB -
TrainingPeaks - swim issue.pdf 50 KB -
9:24 swim view of actual distances swum in Apple Fitness.png 236 KB
3 votes -
-
EF - Kalkulation
Hey Leute!
Derzeit ärgere ich mich täglich über die EF - Kalkulation bei Läufen.
Stelle ich bei TSS auf rTSS ein, dann wird mir bei meiner Athletin Malin Ehlers ein EF von 0.02 bei einer NGP von 04:44 min/km und einer Herzfrequenz von 159 errechnet. Was soll denn da die Grundlage sein?
Stelle ich auf TSS um, dann wird der TSS viel zu hoch berechnet für eine Einheit von 46:52 Minuten ein TSS von 131. Das ist überhaupt nicht möglich!! Zudem wird dann ein EF-Wert von 1.97 errechnet, weil wahrscheinlich die fiktiv errechneten Wattwerte von 314 als Grundlage genommen werden.…3 votes
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
- Don't see your idea?